There are many pros and cons to the practice of animal testing. Of course, this does not mean some labs or scientists do not abuse their lab animals. Cons Animal testing statistics are alarming. Moreover, captive breeding can help raise the number of endangered wild animals. Photograph: Nancy Houser Why is Preliminary Animal Testing Necessary? With rise in poaching of wild animals for fur, ivory and supposed medicinal benefits, zoos appear to be the safe havens for animals.
Humanity has always been caught in dualities. But we have to keep testing for our own good. The types of animals being tested are fish, rats, birds, and rabbits. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. This topic will always be debated among scholars, animal lovers, and scientists. However, if animal testing could save a person I love then I can see why people agree with it but it is controversial.
It is up to us as intelligent individuals to seek the truth out before blindly going into a rage. But when looking more in deph there is some pros and cons to everything,and it really just depends on how the individual looks at it,however this article was very useful but it did put me in a huge dillemma. Some substances tested, may never be used for anything useful: The unfortunate aspect is that many of these animals received tests for substances that will never actually see approval or public consumption and use. On top of that, animal testing may occur more than once and over the course of months, which means that additional costs are incurred. These days, zoo authorities place a greater emphasis on education of environmental problems and conservation rather serving as merely a recreation.
Due to the fact that medical science has only come so far, it cannot be guaranteed that all treatments that are given to animals will work for people and this can cause mistreatment of the animals as well as the medical mistreatment to people. He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. Shocking Facts Did you know that 90 percent of animals used in medical and commercial testing are not protected? Most zoos do not emphasize on studying animal behavior. Honey begins when our valiant Pollen Jocks bring the nectar to the hive. Preliminary animal testing is said to be necessary because there is no experimental medicines allowed on sick people until it is more advanced and data shows it may work. Helps researchers to find drugs and treatments: The major pro for animal testing is that it aids researchers in finding drugs and treatments to improve health and medicine.
This excludes birds, fish, rats, cold blood animals and farm animals regardless of warm or cold blooded from experimentation and testing. I guess he could have just gotten out of the way. It won't be fair to shut down all the zoos for the mistakes committed by a few in the past. While animal testing by scientists has been fraught with controversy, it's still a fact that animals are captured for experiments. Tremendous animal pain and suffering for the sake of scientific advancement to protect mankind is unnecessary. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
The main criticism here is that some believe animal testing is unreliable. Not all zoos subject animals to cruel treatment. In so many different ways, animals differ from people, and therefore are seen as bad test subjects. A Debate Among the Masses The two main arguments regarding animal testing is that it is inhumane and abusive to animals, while others feel that because there are not enough willing people that companies need to learn and experiment somehow to better help the world, and thus turn to animals. Moreover, the nutrition of cats and dogs has been improved after repeated animal tests.
Animal tests are very expensive and this is considered by some, mostly researchers on a strict budget, as a con. Who knows if they use anesthesia safely. Does Testing on Lab Animals Hurt? We know that you, as a bee, have worked your whole life to get to the point where you can work for your whole life. I would think about it before you do it. This article throws light on these various issues. However, can pricking needles and using chemicals on animals be painless? If animals can't speak, does it mean that we can use them as we wish, just because we're powerful? Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
Animals and humans are never exactly the same: There is also the argument that the reaction of a drug in an animal's body is quite different from the reaction in a human. There are many other cures and vaccines that have been created and found thanks to animal testing. Without these tests being done, there would never be a cure or vaccine for the illnesses that affect animals. I agree it could help solve cures and deaths but I think that things happen for a reason, and that their is probably a better way to get through cancer and other deseases. A major reason is that different diseases are spreading rapidly across the world in staggering proportions.