If the government wanted to promote greener transport then it should do it in a way that does not just discriminate against young people. People should have the choice as to whether they drive or use other forms of transport. There are many people who may oppose my opinion. Product cost — are those costs that are identified with goods purchased or produced for resale. The discussion of keeping the minimum driving age at 16 or raising it to 21 revolves around generic maturity, but there is more than just that to look at. Main Part: It could be good to rise the driving age to 21 because 21s or over are responsible and can be trusted.
If the driving age is 21 fewer deaths would happen and roads would be safer. In 2009, more than 5,600 people were killed in crashes involving drivers ages 15-20. Peole are going to be the same no matter how old they are! Most of the drivers forget to use their seat belts after consuming alcohol. In Australia the legal age to get your learners is 16-17 in most states. Majority of 18 year olds aren't even capable of maturity, and thoughts that they still may have immature friends or distractions in the car could be a fatal mistake. Raising the age therefore would not dramatically increase deaths and injuries.
The debate has been talked about for the last few years. However, in countries such as Finland where new drivers are not just let loose on the road immediately after passing the test, the numbers show there are far fewer collisions per capita involving young drivers. Evidently, the public, and therefore their elected representatives, are not in favor of delaying licensure. Driving should be one of the privileges and responsibilities of adulthood. I am going to explore both sides and in the end choose one for my self. Some will say that 16 year olds should not be allowed to drive because they are irresponsible; if they take the required classes and pass their tests then they have already developed that key responsibility before they can even be allowed to drive.
Teenagers do not have the same risk assessment skills that adults have. It is not the maturiety that matters it is the responsibility of getting behind the wheel of a motorized vehical. Being able to drive at 16 can really be helpful to parents especially with so many work. Elders that are and certain age should not be able to drive because … they not able to see and hear as well when they were younger. This is undoubtedly very dangerous and potentially hazardous, as a new driver who has not yet mastered driving may panic and cause tragic accidents. In the younger teen years, smartphones and other technology distractions can make driving very dangerous.
Car safety, Driver's education, Driver's license 821 Words 3 Pages have proven to be incapable of obtaining respectable driving skills. I wanted to know what military people thought about this topic, what. Some kids get a bus ride to school and they don't have parents who can drive them so they need the car. Not to mention, the people thathave their drivers license before 18 will get theirs taken awayeven if they are completely innocent. Also, there are studies that show that 16-year-old have more car crashes than 18-year-olds.
Now, in this editorial I am going to be focusing on the fact that you can be as young as 16 to get a drivers license in this country. For example, using electronic-road pricing could better manage demand and congestion levels. Raising the driving age would not decrease teen fatalities and lessen teen responsibilities. According to studies, males of all ages are 77% more likely to kill someone when driving than females. I loved Margaret from her first breath and I will love, mourn and miss her until my last.
He lived in a time when there was no minimum drinking age. The first disadvantage the article cites is the lack of adequate public transportation to compensate for the increased burden that such a restriction would place on American families. He doesnt have a clue and i personally think he should be out now!! Product costs i Direct material cost — all those materials that can be identified or traced to a specific product. Anyone over the years of 21 has far more brains and experience in a car. If an applicant is 17 years of age or younger when they apply for their learner permit, they must hold the learner permit for six months before applying for a driver license. In order to try and prevent this problem America has tried a national prohibition in the. And if the driving age were to be raised to 21, public transportation would have to be improved if your town had no form of it or if it just needed to be improved on.
What they don't say is that statistics also show that men of all ages are 77 percent more likely to kill someone while driving than women. But here is the most powerful argument of all: the figures suggest that raising the driving age could cut annual road deaths by as many as 1,000. More people will be taken for 21 and can get drunk and then they might drive and kill someone. As teenagers get older, they mature, and the hormones in their bodies settle, which truly allows them to think better. Teens need the ability to drive just as much as anyone else--to get to school, to get to work, to get to sports or band practice, or just to go out with their friends. People taking driving tests being taken is on the increase.
Also, why would you want someone to start driving as soon as they can legally drink? Any misdemeanours and the clock restarts. Automobile, Driver's license, Driving 836 Words 2 Pages Sinita L Acklin Mr. A good idea would be to increase the amount of time a teen needs a permit for in order to get more experience before actually getting drivers license. Then why restrict all teens, including the law-abiding and mature, by raising the driving age? They think that when these teens are a little older their risk crashing will decrease. The younger the driver, the higher the risk.